Call 07 3102 3337

Call 07 3102 3337

reception@praxisphysio.com.au

Call 07 3102 3337
Book Online
Fact or Fiction Friday – Lower back Pain and MRI’s

Fact or Fiction Friday – Lower back Pain and MRI’s

by | Nov 8, 2022 | Lower Back, Pain

I need to get an MRI to help with the management of my lower back pain

Answer – FICTION

In a recent narrative review, Wang and colleagues (2018) concluded that MRI imaging in the early stages of lower back pain can have detrimental effects including more pain, less improvement, higher risk of surgery and worse overall health status. In fact, one study reported that patients that received an MRI within the first month had an 8x greater risk for surgery and 5x more medical costs!

If you do NOT present with severe neurological deficits, signs of a serious or specific underlying condition or have persistent pain >6 weeks which is unresponsive to conservative treatment then there likely isn’t a need for further investigation!

To get help with your long standing back pain or even that acute flare up, give us a call on (07) 3102 3337 or book online  so we can sort you out.

#praxiswhatyoupreach #praxisphysio #factorfictionfriday #physioeducation #preventprepareperform #pain #backpain #lowerbackpain #MRI #patienteducation

Wang Y, et al. Informed appropriate imaging for low back pain management: A narrative review. Journal of Orthopaedic Translation. 2018.

Lower Back Pain

Lower Back Pain

by | Dec 3, 2019 | Lower Back, Pain

Sharp catch of pain? Ongoing aches? Trouble getting out of bed or with long car rides? Stiff and sore when you are bending over to pick things up? Referred pain into you legs?

If you’ve experienced any of these symptoms recently you are not alone. Lower back pain is a common ailment affecting people of all ages and lifestyles with up to 80% of us experiencing various symptoms in our lifetime. Lower back pain can be caused by various factors such as poor posture, muscle strain, joint pain or underlying medical conditions.

Back pain is complex. These aches and pains are usually a sign that your spine are not tolerating loads well and are more sensitive than usual. Symptoms could arise from a subtle change in muscle balance and biomechanics, altered postures, novel or increases in training intensity or even your thoughts arounds the fragility of your spine. Physiotherapy offers effective solutions for managing and alleviating lower back pain by assessing the root cause of the pain, educating you on what is happening and develop personalised treatment plans. We also employ techniques like manual therapy, exercises, and stretches to strengthen you, improve flexibility, return you to activity and desensitise the painful area. Physiotherapy also includes education on proper body mechanics and ergonomics to prevent future episodes in activities such as lifting, sports or activitities of daily living.

Mid Potion Achilles Tendinopathy Location

Whatever the cause, our highly trained Praxis physiotherapists have expertise in this area and will help identify the problem and work with you so that you will feel empowered to fix the problem. At Praxis Physio, this is our point of difference. We promise to take the time to fix you using a range of modalities including advice, hands on manual therapies, reformer pilates and of course strength and conditioning programming.

No need to accept back pain as ‘normal’ call us now on (07) 3102 3337 or book online to have one of our physios get you back on track before your pain becomes any worse.

Team Praxis,

PREVENT | PREPARE | PERFORM

Pilates: Mat vs Reformer Pilates (Part 2 of 3)

Pilates: Mat vs Reformer Pilates (Part 2 of 3)

by | Jun 21, 2019 | Reformer Pilates

In part one, we unearthed that pilates has a role to play in reducing the severity of chronic lower back pain. In part two, we tackle a common question from our patients and delve further into the research to see if there is a difference between mat and reformer pilates.

SUMMARY:

  • A reformer is a large piece of pilates equipment that utilises a spring mechanism to apply load in various positions and degrees of loading from gravity.
  • Both forms of exercise are better than the ‘wait and see’ or pharmacological approach with respect to chronic lower back pain
  • The use of reformers may provide a larger stimuli to the sensory system which facilitates proper performance due to better stabilisation
  • Pilates promotes the restoration of the function of muscles involved in lumbopelvic stabilisation, that is, transversus abdominis, multifidus, diaphragm and pelvic floor muscles (the “core”)
  • Reformer pilates provides more options for strengthening, ideal for those recovering from injury, pregnancy or surgery

 

As a general rule, the aim of pilates is to restore or sustain the motor control of the lumbar spine and proper body posture. Joseph Pilates (the founder of pilates) believed beginning exercise in the horizontal plane was important to relieve the stress and strain on the joints, and to align the body before adding additional gravitational forces while standing, sitting or kneeling.

Both mat and reformer are popular types of pilates which both focus on strengthening. Mat pilates, as its names suggests is a floor based method that tends to use bodyweight as the chief form of resistance.

Reformer, is the most popular equipment of Pilates. The design of Reformer utilises a spring mechanism that the person works to control while moving in various planes (Bulguroglu et al 2017). Reformer pilates allows more exercises compared to a mat and it provides the option of performing exercises numerous body positions – from your back, side, stomach and being seated — and also on your feet or knees.

COMPARE THE PAIR

Not a great deal of research has been conducted on differentiating the two forms of pilates. What studies do exist tend poorly define what equipment was used or whether individual tailoring of the sessions occurred.

Luz et al compared the effectiveness of Pilates mat and equipment-based Pilates exercises (with the use of Reformer) in a group of 86 individuals with chronic lower back pain. The 6-week routine included individual, 1-hour sessions performed twice a week and supervised by a Pilates-experienced physical therapist. The outcome measures were: pain intensity, disability, global perceived effect, patient’s specific disability and fear of movement, known as kinesiophobia (Luz et al 2014). The assessment was recorded after 6-week intervention and 6 months. A significant difference was noted in both groups after a 6-week programme in all of the areas evaluated. After 6 months however, a significant difference was found in disability, specific disability and kinesiophobia in favour of equipment-based Pilates exercises (Luz et al 2014; Eilks et al 2019).

 

In the study by Cruz-Diaz et al, the influence of Pilates mat exercises and equipment-based Pilates exercises (with reformer) on pain, disability, kinesiophobia and activation of transversus abdominis (expressed as a change in muscle thickness and assessed by real-time ultrasound examination) was assessed. The trial involved 98 patients with chronic lower back pan (CLBP) allocated to three groups: Pilates mat exercises, Pilates apparatus or the control group. The programme was conducted in groups of four participants during 12 weeks with 50 min sessions (twice a week). The evaluation was carried out during intervention (6 weeks after baseline) and after 12 weeks. As with Luz et al, significant improvement were shown in both groups for all outcome measures after 6 and 12 weeks. However, in the comparison between groups, the superiority of equipment-based Pilates was noted (Cruz-Diaz et al 2017).In both studies, it was suggested that the finding may be an effect of the use of apparatus in exercises that provides larger stimuli to the sensory system, resulting in larger feedback, which facilitates proper performance due to better stabilisation (Eilks et al 2019). According to da Luz et al, this result may also be caused by a placebo effect inherent for the application of equipment. As noted earlier however, reformer pilates offers a larger scope of exercises to draw upon for those who are limited by pain, weakness or fear of movement.So there you have it. What little research there is suggests that any pilates is good for your rehabilitation or as a part of your ongoing strength program. However, it appears that reformer pilates is more effective, and allows a greater degree of variability of training.For more about what makes Praxis Pilates special, check out our website here.Join us for part 3 next week where we look at what the research suggests regarding the frequency of pilates. Is more actually better?Till next time – Praxis what you preachPrevent. Prepare. Perform

References:

  1. Eliks, M., Zgorzalewicz-Stachowiak, M., & Zeńczak-Praga, K. (2019). Application of Pilates-based exercises in the treatment of chronic non-specific low back pain: state of the art. Postgraduate medical journal, 95(1119), 41-45.
  2. da Luz Jr, M. A., Costa, L. O. P., Fuhro, F. F., Manzoni, A. C. T., Oliveira, N. T. B., & Cabral, C. M. N. (2014). Effectiveness of mat Pilates or equipment-based Pilates exercises in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Physical therapy, 94(5), 623-631.
  3. Bulguroglu, I., Guclu-Gunduz, A., Yazici, G., Ozkul, C., Irkec, C., Nazliel, B., & Batur-Caglayan, H. Z. (2017). The effects of Mat Pilates and Reformer Pilates in patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A randomized controlled study. NeuroRehabilitation, 41(2), 413-422.
  4. Cruz-Díaz, D., Bergamin, M., Gobbo, S., Martínez-Amat, A., & Hita-Contreras, F. (2017). Comparative effects of 12 weeks of equipment based and mat Pilates in patients with Chronic Low Back Pain on pain, function and transversus abdominis activation. A randomized controlled trial. Complementary therapies in medicine, 33, 72-77.
Pilates: Reforming our back pain rehabilitation (Part 1 of 3)

Pilates: Reforming our back pain rehabilitation (Part 1 of 3)

by | Jun 3, 2019 | Lower Back, Pain, Reformer Pilates

With our 30 day pilates challenge starting today, we thought we would take a look at why we love pilates so much for our patients, and what some of the benefits are. Part 1 looks at how pilates affect those with chronic lower back pain. Part 2 looks at the difference between mat and reformer pilates and part 3 looks at how often is required to see the benefit of pilates.

SUMMARY:

  • Back pain is extremely common, multifactorial, and often reoccurs
  • Strengthening interventions appear better for long term suffers of lower back pain
  • Pilates has been shown to improve muscular strength and endurance of key pelvic and postural musculature associated with lower back pain
  • Specifically, pilates promotes the restoration of the function of muscles involved in lumbopelvic stabilisation, that is, transversus abdominis, multifidus, diaphragm and pelvic floor muscles
  • As little as 2 sessions per week for 6 weeks has been shown to see improvements in pain and function for those with longstanding lower back pain, even after stopping pilates

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is one of the commonest musculoskeletal problems in modern society (Anderson 1999) and is a highly prevalent in both the sporting and general public. CLBP is experienced by 70%–80% of adults at some time in their lives (Crombez et al 1999) and as such, the costs associated with LBP and related disability are enormous, causing a major economic burden for patients, governments and health insurance companies (Dagenais 2008).

Lower back pain has been one of the most extensively studied musculoskeletal conditions as a result of the prevalence and debilitation nature. Its management comprises a range of different intervention strategies including surgery, drug therapy and non-medical intervention like rehabilitation (Paolucci et al 2018). Within Physiotherapy, exercise therapy is probably the most commonly used intervention for the treatment of patients with chronic non-specific LBP due to its plausible biological rationale and low cost.

Whilst general conditioning programs to train strength and endurance of the spine musculature have been shown to reduce pain intensity and disability (Rainville et al 2004), the popularity of pilates (both mat and reformer) has helped provide an accessible and supervised form of therapeutic exercise.

EVIDENCE FOR PILATES

The Pilates method, using functional exercises aims to improve muscular strength and endurance. Specifically, the pilates method have promotes the restoration of the function of muscles involved in lumbopelvic stabilisation, that is, transversus abdominis, multifidus, diaphragm and pelvic floor muscles. Using the principles of progressive overload, your body adapts to the incremental loading week after week and consequently results important postural control improvement. In 2009, Curnow and colleagues showed that the Pilates method improves load transfer through the pelvis, something that intuitively helps those with CLBP.

However, a systematic review (Patti et al 2015) reported evidence that Pilates method-based exercises are more effective than no treatment or minimal physical exercise interventions in the management of chronic nonspecific LBP. Further, they pointed out that the effects of the Pilates method are only proven for patients with chronic nonspecific LBP in the short term.

A recent study by Natour and colleagues (2015) showed that the group of participants that were practicing Pilates method resulted statistically better compared with the a non exercising group who only used inflammatory medication. Those who were in the pilates group used less pain medication at 45, 90 (conclusion of the Pilates method), and 180 days, 90 days after the conclusion of the exercise program.

In conclusion, Pilates as an exercise choice is more effective than minimal physical exercise or drug based interventions in reducing pain and disability in the short-term period. There is agreement that exercise “helps” in the treatment of chronic pain, but it is still not clear exactly which factors or particular kind of exercises may be responsible of such improvements (Natour et al 2015; Patti et al 2015). Praxis Physiotherapy has always been a strong proponent of movement and loading early in rehabilitation (more on this in later blogs!).

In the next instalment, we discuss the difference between mat and reformer pilates and perhaps find some more answers regarding which exercise regime reigns supreme!

Check out all our other reformer pilates services on our website

Until next time,

Prevent. Prepare. Perform.

References:

  1. Andersson GB. Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain. Lancet. 1999;354(91789178):581–585.
  2. Crombez G, Vlaeyen JW, Heuts PH, Lysens R, Crombez G. Pain-related fear is more disabling than pain itself: evidence on the role of pain-related fear in chronic back pain disability. Pain. 1999;80(1-2):329–339.
  3. Dagenais DC, Caro J, Haldeman S. A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally. The Spine Journal 2008;8(1):8‐20.
  4. Paolucci, T., Attanasi, C., Cecchini, W., Marazzi, A., Capobianco, S. V., & Santilli, V. (2019). Chronic low back pain and postural rehabilitation exercise: a literature review. Journal of pain research, 12, 95.
  5. Rainville J, Hartigan C, Martinez E, Limke J, Jouve C, Finno M. Exercise as a treatment for chronic low back pain. Spine J. 2004;4:106-115
  6. Patti, A., Bianco, A., Paoli, A., Messina, G., Montalto, M. A., Bellafiore, M., … & Palma, A. (2015). Effects of Pilates exercise programs in people with chronic low back pain: a systematic review. Medicine, 94(4).
  7. Curnow, D., Cobbin, D., Wyndham, J., & Choy, S. B. (2009). Altered motor control, posture and the Pilates method of exercise prescription. Journal of bodywork and movement therapies, 13(1), 104-111.
  8. Natour, J., Cazotti, L. D. A., Ribeiro, L. H., Baptista, A. S., & Jones, A. (2015). Pilates improves pain, function and quality of life in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Clinical rehabilitation, 29(1), 59-68.
The Single Leg Squat

The Single Leg Squat

by | Dec 17, 2018 | Gym and Strength, Team Praxis

For those of you who have ever read a research article and thought it was a tough read, i’d like to let you in on a little secret. Doing the research is far worse! If only memes were a thing when I started my Masters of Applied Science thesis, I’d have changed my background to remind myself that conducting research was even drier than every dish an apprentice has cooked for Gordon Ramsey.

My mentor at the time, who was the manager of the sports science and sports medicine devision of Cricket Australia and later the head of the AIS human movements department, Dr Marc Portus, enlightened me with something quite profound. He said, “There are two outcomes from a thesis. Either you live it for the rest of you academic days or it sits on a bookshelf for years collecting dust.” Given I completed my thesis and went straight onto my graduate entry physiotherapy masters, it is fair to say i’m in the later camp. Quite a few years have passed now however, so I’d thought i’d dust off the cover and summarise my thesis for all of you playing at home!

So not to degrade my self entirely, I thought I found some pretty good stuff that has affected the way I assess and treat today. I haven’t shared it all today as it was more than 140 pages long and ‘ain’t nobody got time for that’. More importantly though, my thesis reminded me of the passion I have for lower limb biomechanics and that physiotherapy (as opposed to research) was always meant to be on the cards for me. My thesis, “The 3D Kinematics of the Single Leg Flat and Decline Squats” boiled down to looking at how the ankle position changed the joint angles single leg squat, how hip strength affected the squat as well as few other things that aren’t worth mentioning here.

BACKGROUND:

The single leg squat (SLS) replicates an athletic position commonly assumed in sport such as cutting (powerful change in direction while running made from one leg), jumping and balancing which all require the control of the trunk and pelvis on the weight bearing femur in all three planes of movement [1-5].

As such, the SLS is commonly used by clinicians as a functional measure of dynamic lumbo-pelvic stability [endif]–[6-8]. Abnormal movement within the SLS tend to be characterised by the commonly described “medial collapse” or “dynamic valgus”. Specifically, there is excessive femoral internal rotation, femoral adduction, knee valgus, tibial internal rotation and foot pronation of the weight-bearing limb with resultant excursion of the contralateral non weight bearing Ilium and excessive lateral flexion of the trunk [endif]–[3, 6-8].

The reason why this tends to be perceived as a big deal is that this position tends to be argued as a lack of lumbopelvic stability and results in increased loading of the knee. Moreover, pelvis weakness tends to be ascribed to the absence of stability ultimately resulting in a position in which many acute and overuse injuries of the lower limb may occur. These ailments include, ACL / MCL ruptures, patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS), illiotibial band friction syndrome (ITBFS) and shin splints to name a few. That is why the SLS appears to be a valuable rough screening tool in clinical practice.

MY FINDINGS:

As mentioned, I looked at how a decline board of 20 degrees changed the angles of the lower limb during the squat. I also looked at if any strength measures of the hip related to how someone squatted between conditions. Finally, I looked at if the decline board altered how someone was scored by experienced physiotherapist as a competent or not at the squat

JOINT ANGLES (KINETMATICS:)

A picture tells a thousand words so in the interests of brevity, the stick squat figure is essentially a summary of two years of work.

So what this means, when someone performs a SLS on a flat surface, relative to a decline surface they tend to have:

  • A more upright torso
  • More rotation of the pelvis toward the weigh bearing (WB) limb
  • Reduced flexion but more adduction and internal rotation of the thigh on the WB hip (pelvic close to femur)
  • Less flexion of the knee but the same position relative to the foot as you look from the front (known as frontal plane knee excursion) at the bottom of range
  • Reduced internal rotation of the shin
  • Reduced ankle flexion

Essentially, in a flat squat you tend to ‘corkscrew’ your pelvis and adopt the medial collapse position much more easily than in the decline squat position. This may because of ankle range of motion issues as well as the ability to adequately recruit pelvic musculature. Yep – two years to get that!

STRENGTH AND MOVEMENT:

My results demonstrated a tendency for the pelvis to remain increasingly level with greater hip abduction strength. However, the relationship between strength and the pelvis was observed in the decline condition but not the flat condition. This may be due to hip abduction was shown to be significantly less (more neutral) in the SLDS which seemingly promoted greater muscle activation and subsequent control of pelvis. The self selection of squat depth may have also been a critical factor in finding as those with weak hips may have squatted deep to adopt maladaptive positions. Previous research has indicated that the hip abductors and external rotators play an important role in lower extremity alignment as they assist in the maintenance of a level pelvis [9] and are capable in balancing a number of biomechanical forces in the body [10].

Interestingly, there were no significant relationships observed between hip abduction strength and knee valgus (knee falling in) for both squatting conditions. There was however a trend between hip abduction strength and knee valgus which supported previous research. It is keeping with the assumption that increased knee valgus might also be associated with reduced hip abduction and external rotation strength [11].

SUMMARY:

  • To maximise athletic function, particularly in sports such as soccer, netball and AFL, stability through the pelvis and hips, proximal lower limb, spine and abdominal structures is required [12].
  • The importance of pelvis stabilisation for lower extremity injury prevention [13] particularly the knee [14-17] has been well documented in the literature.
  • Adequate lumbopelvic-femur strength and muscle function may conceivably reduce exposure to other intrinsic risk factors such as inefficient force attenuation, unstable movement patterns and lower limb malalignments during activity [18, 19].
  • Ankle flexibility may also be a factor in lower limb physical resilience and injury prevention.
  • Support for the previous statements has been demonstrated in the relationships between hip strength measures and kinematics within selected results of my study.

There you have it. Two years of my life summarised to a few paragraphs. From a personal perspective, I took away from my research experience to be always questioning why we do things and see if there is someone out there who has answered the questions we seek. Finally, don’t overcook chicken – Ramsay doesn’t like it.

REFERENCES:

  1. Neely, F.G., Intrinsic risk factors for exercise-related lower limb injuries. Journal of Sports Medicine, 1998. 26(4): p. 253-263.
  2. Parkkari, J., U.M. Kujala, and K. Pekka, Is it possible to prevent sports injuries? Review of controlled clinical trials and recommendations for future work. Sports Medicine, 2001. 31(14): p. 985-995.
  3. Lysens, R.J., et al., The accident -prone and overuse-prone profiles of the young athlete. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1989. 17(5): p. 612-619.
  4. Egger, G., Sports injuries in Australia: causes, costs and prevention. A report to the national better health program., ed. C.f.H.P.a. Research. 1990, Sydney.
  5. Orchard, J.W. and C.F. Finch, Australia needs to follow New Zealand’s lead on sports injuries. The Medical Journal of Australia, 2002. 177: p. 38-39.
  6. Wu, G. and P.R. Cavanagh, ISB recommendations for standardization in the reporting of kinematic data. Journal of Biomechanics, 1995. 28: p. 1257- 1261.
  7. Siegal, P., R. Brackbill, and G. Heath, The epidemiology of walking exercise: implications for promoting activity among sedentary groups. American Journal of Public Health, 1995. 85(5): p. 706-710.
  8. Nicholl, J.P., P. Coleman, and B.T. Williams, The epidemiology of sports and exercise related injury in the United Kingdom. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 1995. 29(4): p. 232-238.
  9. Burnet, E.N. and P.E. Pidcoe, Isometric gluteus medius muscle torque and frontal plane pelvic motion during running. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 2009. 8: p. 284-288
  10. Niemuth, P., et al., Hip muscle weakness and overuse injuries in recreational runners. Clinical Journal of Sports Medicine, 2005. 15(1): p. 14-21.
  11. Hollman, J.H., et al., Relationships between knee valgus, hip-muscle strength, and hip-muscle recruitment during a single-limb step down. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation, 2009. 18: p. 104-117.
  12. Kibler, W.B., J. Press, and A. Sciascia, The role of core stability in the athletic function Journal of Sports Medicine, 2006. 36(3): p. 189-198.
  13. Leetun, D.T., et al., Core stability measures as risk factors for lower extremity injury in athletes. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2004. 36(6): p. 926-934.
  14. Cichanowski, H., et al., Hip strength in collegiate female athletes with patellofemoral pain. Medicine & Science in Sport & Exercise, 2007. 39(8): p. 1227-1232.
  15. Ireland, M.L., et al., Hip strength measures in female with and without patellofemoral pain. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 2003. 33(11): p. 671-676.
  16. Nicholas, J.A., A.M. Strizak, and G. Veras, A study of thigh muscle weakness in different pathological states of the lower extremity. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1976. 4: p. 241-248.
  17. Prins, M.R. and P.V.D. Wurff, Females with patellofemoral pain syndrome have weak hip muscles: a systematic review. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 2009. 55: p. 9-15.
  18. Willson, J.D., M.L. Ireland, and I. Davis, Core strength and lower extremity alignment during single leg squats. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2006. 38(5): p. 945-952.
  19. Lee, D., The pelvic girdle: An approach to the examination and treatment of the lumbopelvic-hip region. 3rd ed. 2004, Edinburugh: Churchill Livingston.