Call 07 3102 3337

Call 07 3102 3337

reception@praxisphysio.com.au

Call 07 3102 3337
Book Online
Fact or Fiction – Preseason Training

Fact or Fiction – Preseason Training

by | Nov 22, 2019 | Gym and Strength, Return to Sport, Sports Injury

Answer – FACT

With preseason training just around the corner, this blog is a timely reminder that turning up to preseason training consistently will give athletes the best chance of being able to play most games next year.

Murray et al (2017) reported that AFL players who completed <50% of pre-season training were 2x more likely to sustain in-season injury than those who completed >85%! This is not just relevant to elite AFL, it is relevant to all sports of all levels (even more so)! So what’s the take home message? For the best chance to be able to play week in/week out during the competitive phase of the season, consistency during preseason is vital.

If you had injuries last season or are trying to make this your best season yet, see us to make sure you are ticking all the boxes!

#praxisphysio #preventprepareperform #factorfictionfriday #preseasontraining #praxispwhatyoupreach #afl #sportsphysio #preventprepareperform

References:

Murray NB, et al. Relationship Between Preseason Training Load and In-Season Availability in Elite Australian Football Players. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017.

Fact or Fiction – Strength Training

Fact or Fiction – Strength Training

by | Nov 15, 2019 | Uncategorized

I’ve been doing my exercises for two weeks religiously and I’m no stronger! This will never work!

ANSWER: Fiction

How long does it take to have strength gains? The answer is actually in two parts. Increasing muscle size (hypertrophy) takes a minimum of 6 weeks, and repetitive exposures to fatiguing loads. BUT, neural adaptations can occur over the first 1-2 weeks.

What the heck is neural adaptations? Imaging you have a small car battery trying to start a truck. It will struggle to do a good job again and again and fade easily. Now try using 10 of those same smaller batteries, which makes the engine start easier. A similar type of thing happens with our nervous system as we train. We become much more efficient with our neural firing to the muscle.

As you can see in the picture below, you have a long way to go in your strengthening after those first two weeks. That is often why we often need to see beyond when the pain goes away as we know that there is so much more work to be done!

If you have been troubled by niggles and pains, don’t hesitate to contact us to ensure we can help you prevent prepare perform! Book online or call us on (07) 3102 3337.

#factorfictionfriday #praxisphysio #physioeducation #knowledgeiskey

Sale, D. G. (1988). Neural adaptation to resistance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 20(5 Suppl), S135-145. doi:10.1249/00005768-198810001-00009

Chronic Groin Pain (Athletic Pubalgia)

Chronic Groin Pain (Athletic Pubalgia)

by | Oct 26, 2019 | Gym and Strength, Hip, Pain, Return to Sport, Sports Injury

GROIN PAIN

Groin pain, referred to also as athletic pubalgia, is a common problem for a number of athletes, particularly those who engage in sports that require specific use (or overuse) of lower abdominal muscles and the proximal muscles of the thigh. Predominantly, these activities centre around kicking sports such as AFL and soccer, as well as long distance running. Ice hockey is also a well renowned sport in which chronic groin pain occurs. All these sports involve repetitive energetic kicking, twisting, turning or cutting movements, which are all risk factors for causing pubalgia.

SUMMARY:

  • Four structures are commonly implicated in the causes of groin pain
  • Adductor muscles
  • Pubic bone
  • Abdominal wall
  • Iliopsoas
  • Understanding which of these four structures is causing your pain is key in effective management
  • Exercise therapy and activity modifications should be the mainstay of treatment
  • Absolute rest has been shown to be ineffective
  • Steady gradual progressions through strength and function, tailored to your goals, is key to successful management
Mid Potion Achilles Tendinopathy Location

ROLE OF HIP ADDUCTORS (groin muscles)

Similar to other joints in the body, the hip relies on muscular control for stability and movement. At the hip, there are five key planes of movement; flexion, extension, abduction, adduction and rotation.

The adductor muscles are a large group of muscles located on the inner side of the thigh, attaching from below the knee, along the shaft of the femur and into the pubic bone of the pelvis.

While acute tears of the adductor muscle is common, more long standing pain is usually the result of an overload of the adductor tendon that attach to the pelvis. This is called an adductor tendinopathy. Adductor enthesopathy is common disorder which effects the bony attachment point of the tendon, with a slight structural difference from tendinopathy, however, management is similar in both cases

MANAGEMENT OPTIONS

Exercise:

Strength and functional based exercise are the core management strategies for adductor tendinopathy, and have been shown to increase function, decrease pain and reduce likelihood of injury [4].

Activity Modification:

Activity modification, especially in the acute phase or when symptoms are significantly affecting function, is key in reducing load on the affected structures and allowing tissues to adapt. [1]

Rest:

While activity modification is important, absolute rest has been shown to be ineffective in the management of adductor tendinopathy, and does not promote adequate tissue repair. [1,2]

Other:

Other conservative measures such as manual therapy, electrotherapy and stretching have been [1] explored, with reduced effect compared exercise prescription. Surgical management is also a potential option, with some positive results emerging for groin pain, though specific evidence [10] around adductor tendinopathy is limited. [10]

WHY IS EXERCISE IMPORTANT?

Exercise has been shown to increase tendon turnover, meaning in the first 24-36 hours there is a reduction in tendon integrity, but after that there is an overall increase in integrity and strength. Other benefits include: increased blood flow, increase in growth factors, and a reduction in altered pain processes in the brain [14].

WHAT’S THE BEST EXERCISE?

Isometric exercise has been shown to be effective in short term pain relief. Current evidence is unclear as to the best long term exercise strategies, with evidence supporting both eccentric and heavy-slow isotonic exercise. [12]

EXERCISE PLAN

The Copenhagen Adductor Program [9], with the below dosage, has been shown to significantly improve adductor strength, as well as being effective in groin injury prevention. It is important to note that though the program is eight weeks long, most effective tendon[12] adaptations take ≥ 12 weeks, and a tailored dosage should be discussed with your physiotherapist towards the end stage of rehabilitation.

Depending on how the symptoms affect your function, a reduction in training, running and kicking may also be required. Example progressions are noted below in the running program, in order of loading on adductors.

ADDITIONAL STRENGTH AND PROGRAMS

While targeted strengthening to the adductors is key, global strengthening around the hip may also aid in a reduction of loading to the tendon. Thorough assessment of your strength through all five movements noted previously is needed, as well as a tailored training program to resolve any discrepancies.

As symptoms reduce and function improves, part practice of painful activities, can be beneficial to reload structures, for example, banded kicking movements in preparation for return to soccer.

SUMMARY

In chronic adductor tendinopathy, tendon adaptations take time. It is important to understand this as you begin your rehab journey and not progress more than your body can tolerate. Steady gradual progressions through strength and function, tailored to your goals, is key to successful management.

As always, if you have a history of groin pain or are concerned about performance in your chosen sport, contact us today and chat to one of our friendly and knowledgeable physiotherapist to ensure you can Prevent. Prepare. Perform. Alternatively you can book online here

Till next time, Praxis what you Preach

Team Praxis

 

References: 

  1.  Almeida, M.O., et al., Conservative interventions for treating exercise‐related musculotendinous, ligamentous and osseous groin pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2013(6).
  2. Bohm, S., F. Mersmann, and A. Arampatzis, Human tendon adaptation in response to mechanical loading: a systematic review and meta-analysis of exercise intervention studies on healthy adults. Sports Medicine – Open, 2015. 1(1): p. 7.
  3.  Brukner, P., Brukner & Khan’s clinical sports medicine / Peter Brukner … [et al.]. Sports medicine series, ed. K. Khan. 2012, North Ryde, N.S.W: McGraw-Hill Australia.
  4. Charlton, P.C., et al., Exercise Interventions for the Prevention and Treatment of Groin Pain and Injury in Athletes: A Critical and Systematic Review. Sports Med, 2017. 47(10): p. 2011-2026.
  5. Frizziero, A., et al., The role of eccentric exercise in sport injuries rehabilitation. Br Med Bull, 2014. 110(1): p. 47-75.
  6. Griffin, V.C., T. Everett, and I.G. Horsley, A comparison of hip adduction to abduction strength ratios, in the dominant and non-dominant limb, of elite academy football players. Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Informatics, 2015. 2(1): p. 109.
  7. Haroy, J., et al., The Adductor Strengthening Programme prevents groin problems among male football players: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Br J Sports Med, 2019. 53(3): p. 150-157.
  8. Harøy, J., et al., Infographic. The Adductor Strengthening Programme prevents groin problems among male football players. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2019. 53(1): p. 45.
  9. Haroy, J., et al., Including the Copenhagen Adduction Exercise in the FIFA 11+ Provides Missing Eccentric Hip Adduction Strength Effect in Male Soccer Players: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Sports Med, 2017. 45(13): p. 3052-3059.
  10. Jorgensen, S.G., S. Oberg, and J. Rosenberg, Treatment of longstanding groin pain: a systematic review. Hernia, 2019.
  11. Kohavi, B., et al., Effectiveness of Field-Based Resistance Training Protocols on Hip Muscle Strength Among Young Elite Football Players. Clin J Sport Med, 2018.
  12. Lim, H.Y. and S.H. Wong, Effects of isometric, eccentric, or heavy slow resistance exercises on pain and function in individuals with patellar tendinopathy: A systematic review. Physiother Res Int, 2018. 23(4): p. e1721.
  13. Machotka, Z., S. Kumar, and L.G. Perraton, A systematic review of the literature on the effectiveness of exercise therapy for groin pain in athletes. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol, 2009. 1(1): p. 5.
  14. Magnusson, S.P., H. Langberg, and M. Kjaer, The pathogenesis of tendinopathy: balancing the response to loading. Nat Rev Rheumatol, 2010. 6(5): p. 262-8.
  15. Rio, E., et al., Tendon neuroplastic training: changing the way we think about tendon rehabilitation: a narrative review. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2016. 50(4): p. 209.
  16. Thorborg, K., et al., The Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS): development and validation according to the COSMIN checklist. Br J Sports Med, 2011. 45(6): p. 478-91.
  17. Wei, A.S., et al., The effect of corticosteroid on collagen expression in injured rotator cuff tendon. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2006. 88(6): p. 1331-1338.
Pilates: Mat vs Reformer Pilates (Part 2 of 3)

Pilates: Mat vs Reformer Pilates (Part 2 of 3)

by | Jun 21, 2019 | Reformer Pilates

In part one, we unearthed that pilates has a role to play in reducing the severity of chronic lower back pain. In part two, we tackle a common question from our patients and delve further into the research to see if there is a difference between mat and reformer pilates.

SUMMARY:

  • A reformer is a large piece of pilates equipment that utilises a spring mechanism to apply load in various positions and degrees of loading from gravity.
  • Both forms of exercise are better than the ‘wait and see’ or pharmacological approach with respect to chronic lower back pain
  • The use of reformers may provide a larger stimuli to the sensory system which facilitates proper performance due to better stabilisation
  • Pilates promotes the restoration of the function of muscles involved in lumbopelvic stabilisation, that is, transversus abdominis, multifidus, diaphragm and pelvic floor muscles (the “core”)
  • Reformer pilates provides more options for strengthening, ideal for those recovering from injury, pregnancy or surgery

 

As a general rule, the aim of pilates is to restore or sustain the motor control of the lumbar spine and proper body posture. Joseph Pilates (the founder of pilates) believed beginning exercise in the horizontal plane was important to relieve the stress and strain on the joints, and to align the body before adding additional gravitational forces while standing, sitting or kneeling.

Both mat and reformer are popular types of pilates which both focus on strengthening. Mat pilates, as its names suggests is a floor based method that tends to use bodyweight as the chief form of resistance.

Reformer, is the most popular equipment of Pilates. The design of Reformer utilises a spring mechanism that the person works to control while moving in various planes (Bulguroglu et al 2017). Reformer pilates allows more exercises compared to a mat and it provides the option of performing exercises numerous body positions – from your back, side, stomach and being seated — and also on your feet or knees.

COMPARE THE PAIR

Not a great deal of research has been conducted on differentiating the two forms of pilates. What studies do exist tend poorly define what equipment was used or whether individual tailoring of the sessions occurred.

Luz et al compared the effectiveness of Pilates mat and equipment-based Pilates exercises (with the use of Reformer) in a group of 86 individuals with chronic lower back pain. The 6-week routine included individual, 1-hour sessions performed twice a week and supervised by a Pilates-experienced physical therapist. The outcome measures were: pain intensity, disability, global perceived effect, patient’s specific disability and fear of movement, known as kinesiophobia (Luz et al 2014). The assessment was recorded after 6-week intervention and 6 months. A significant difference was noted in both groups after a 6-week programme in all of the areas evaluated. After 6 months however, a significant difference was found in disability, specific disability and kinesiophobia in favour of equipment-based Pilates exercises (Luz et al 2014; Eilks et al 2019).

 

In the study by Cruz-Diaz et al, the influence of Pilates mat exercises and equipment-based Pilates exercises (with reformer) on pain, disability, kinesiophobia and activation of transversus abdominis (expressed as a change in muscle thickness and assessed by real-time ultrasound examination) was assessed. The trial involved 98 patients with chronic lower back pan (CLBP) allocated to three groups: Pilates mat exercises, Pilates apparatus or the control group. The programme was conducted in groups of four participants during 12 weeks with 50 min sessions (twice a week). The evaluation was carried out during intervention (6 weeks after baseline) and after 12 weeks. As with Luz et al, significant improvement were shown in both groups for all outcome measures after 6 and 12 weeks. However, in the comparison between groups, the superiority of equipment-based Pilates was noted (Cruz-Diaz et al 2017). In both studies, it was suggested that the finding may be an effect of the use of apparatus in exercises that provides larger stimuli to the sensory system, resulting in larger feedback, which facilitates proper performance due to better stabilisation (Eilks et al 2019). According to da Luz et al, this result may also be caused by a placebo effect inherent for the application of equipment. As noted earlier however, reformer pilates offers a larger scope of exercises to draw upon for those who are limited by pain, weakness or fear of movement. So there you have it. What little research there is suggests that any pilates is good for your rehabilitation or as a part of your ongoing strength program. However, it appears that reformer pilates is more effective, and allows a greater degree of variability of training. For more about what makes Praxis Pilates special, check out our website here. Join us for part 3 next week where we look at what the research suggests regarding the frequency of pilates. Is more actually better? Till next time – Praxis what you preach Prevent. Prepare. Perform

References:

  1. Eliks, M., Zgorzalewicz-Stachowiak, M., & Zeńczak-Praga, K. (2019). Application of Pilates-based exercises in the treatment of chronic non-specific low back pain: state of the art. Postgraduate medical journal, 95(1119), 41-45.
  2. da Luz Jr, M. A., Costa, L. O. P., Fuhro, F. F., Manzoni, A. C. T., Oliveira, N. T. B., & Cabral, C. M. N. (2014). Effectiveness of mat Pilates or equipment-based Pilates exercises in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Physical therapy, 94(5), 623-631.
  3. Bulguroglu, I., Guclu-Gunduz, A., Yazici, G., Ozkul, C., Irkec, C., Nazliel, B., & Batur-Caglayan, H. Z. (2017). The effects of Mat Pilates and Reformer Pilates in patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A randomized controlled study. NeuroRehabilitation, 41(2), 413-422.
  4. Cruz-Díaz, D., Bergamin, M., Gobbo, S., Martínez-Amat, A., & Hita-Contreras, F. (2017). Comparative effects of 12 weeks of equipment based and mat Pilates in patients with Chronic Low Back Pain on pain, function and transversus abdominis activation. A randomized controlled trial. Complementary therapies in medicine, 33, 72-77.
Pilates: Reforming our back pain rehabilitation (Part 1 of 3)

Pilates: Reforming our back pain rehabilitation (Part 1 of 3)

by | Jun 3, 2019 | Lower Back, Pain, Reformer Pilates

With our 30 day pilates challenge starting today, we thought we would take a look at why we love pilates so much for our patients, and what some of the benefits are. Part 1 looks at how pilates affect those with chronic lower back pain. Part 2 looks at the difference between mat and reformer pilates and part 3 looks at how often is required to see the benefit of pilates.

SUMMARY:

  • Back pain is extremely common, multifactorial, and often reoccurs
  • Strengthening interventions appear better for long term suffers of lower back pain
  • Pilates has been shown to improve muscular strength and endurance of key pelvic and postural musculature associated with lower back pain
  • Specifically, pilates promotes the restoration of the function of muscles involved in lumbopelvic stabilisation, that is, transversus abdominis, multifidus, diaphragm and pelvic floor muscles
  • As little as 2 sessions per week for 6 weeks has been shown to see improvements in pain and function for those with longstanding lower back pain, even after stopping pilates

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is one of the commonest musculoskeletal problems in modern society (Anderson 1999) and is a highly prevalent in both the sporting and general public. CLBP is experienced by 70%–80% of adults at some time in their lives (Crombez et al 1999) and as such, the costs associated with LBP and related disability are enormous, causing a major economic burden for patients, governments and health insurance companies (Dagenais 2008).

Lower back pain has been one of the most extensively studied musculoskeletal conditions as a result of the prevalence and debilitation nature. Its management comprises a range of different intervention strategies including surgery, drug therapy and non-medical intervention like rehabilitation (Paolucci et al 2018). Within Physiotherapy, exercise therapy is probably the most commonly used intervention for the treatment of patients with chronic non-specific LBP due to its plausible biological rationale and low cost.

Whilst general conditioning programs to train strength and endurance of the spine musculature have been shown to reduce pain intensity and disability (Rainville et al 2004), the popularity of pilates (both mat and reformer) has helped provide an accessible and supervised form of therapeutic exercise.

EVIDENCE FOR PILATES

The Pilates method, using functional exercises aims to improve muscular strength and endurance. Specifically, the pilates method have promotes the restoration of the function of muscles involved in lumbopelvic stabilisation, that is, transversus abdominis, multifidus, diaphragm and pelvic floor muscles. Using the principles of progressive overload, your body adapts to the incremental loading week after week and consequently results important postural control improvement. In 2009, Curnow and colleagues showed that the Pilates method improves load transfer through the pelvis, something that intuitively helps those with CLBP.

However, a systematic review (Patti et al 2015) reported evidence that Pilates method-based exercises are more effective than no treatment or minimal physical exercise interventions in the management of chronic nonspecific LBP. Further, they pointed out that the effects of the Pilates method are only proven for patients with chronic nonspecific LBP in the short term.

A recent study by Natour and colleagues (2015) showed that the group of participants that were practicing Pilates method resulted statistically better compared with the a non exercising group who only used inflammatory medication. Those who were in the pilates group used less pain medication at 45, 90 (conclusion of the Pilates method), and 180 days, 90 days after the conclusion of the exercise program.

In conclusion, Pilates as an exercise choice is more effective than minimal physical exercise or drug based interventions in reducing pain and disability in the short-term period. There is agreement that exercise “helps” in the treatment of chronic pain, but it is still not clear exactly which factors or particular kind of exercises may be responsible of such improvements (Natour et al 2015; Patti et al 2015). Praxis Physiotherapy has always been a strong proponent of movement and loading early in rehabilitation (more on this in later blogs!).

In the next instalment, we discuss the difference between mat and reformer pilates and perhaps find some more answers regarding which exercise regime reigns supreme!

Check out all our other reformer pilates services on our website

Until next time,

Prevent. Prepare. Perform.

References:

  1. Andersson GB. Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain. Lancet. 1999;354(91789178):581–585.
  2. Crombez G, Vlaeyen JW, Heuts PH, Lysens R, Crombez G. Pain-related fear is more disabling than pain itself: evidence on the role of pain-related fear in chronic back pain disability. Pain. 1999;80(1-2):329–339.
  3. Dagenais DC, Caro J, Haldeman S. A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally. The Spine Journal 2008;8(1):8‐20.
  4. Paolucci, T., Attanasi, C., Cecchini, W., Marazzi, A., Capobianco, S. V., & Santilli, V. (2019). Chronic low back pain and postural rehabilitation exercise: a literature review. Journal of pain research, 12, 95.
  5. Rainville J, Hartigan C, Martinez E, Limke J, Jouve C, Finno M. Exercise as a treatment for chronic low back pain. Spine J. 2004;4:106-115
  6. Patti, A., Bianco, A., Paoli, A., Messina, G., Montalto, M. A., Bellafiore, M., … & Palma, A. (2015). Effects of Pilates exercise programs in people with chronic low back pain: a systematic review. Medicine, 94(4).
  7. Curnow, D., Cobbin, D., Wyndham, J., & Choy, S. B. (2009). Altered motor control, posture and the Pilates method of exercise prescription. Journal of bodywork and movement therapies, 13(1), 104-111.
  8. Natour, J., Cazotti, L. D. A., Ribeiro, L. H., Baptista, A. S., & Jones, A. (2015). Pilates improves pain, function and quality of life in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Clinical rehabilitation, 29(1), 59-68.