Shin Splints: Causes, Treatment & How to Get Back to Running Stronger

Shin Splints: Causes, Treatment & How to Get Back to Running Stronger

Key Takeaways

  • Shin splints (MTSS) are an overuse bone stress injury.

  • Training load errors are the biggest contributor.

  • Hip strength and force control play a major role.

  • Early management prevents stress fractures.

  • Strength + smart loading beats rest alone.

    Mid Potion Achilles Tendinopathy Location

    Shin Splints

    Shin splints, known in the research as medial tibial stress syndrome (MTSS) are one of the most common running injuries we see at Praxis Physiotherapy across our Teneriffe, Buranda and Carseldine clinics.

    If you’re noticing a dull ache along the inside of your shin that worsens with running, skipping or sport, you’re not alone. The good news? With the right plan, shin splints are highly manageable — and preventable.

    Let’s break down what’s actually happening, why it develops, and what you can start doing today.

    What Are Shin Splints (Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome)?

    Shin splints are an overuse bone stress injury affecting the inner (medial) border of your tibia (shin bone).

    What does it feel like?

    • Aching pain along the lower inside shin

    • Sharp pain when running or jumping

    • Tenderness to touch along the bone

    • Morning stiffness or pain when first starting activity

    Unlike a stress fracture (which is more focal and severe), shin splints usually present as a broader area of tenderness along the bone.

    What’s Actually Happening? (The Pathology Explained Simply)

    MTSS is no longer thought to be just an “inflammation” problem.

    Current evidence suggests shin splints develop due to repetitive loading that exceeds the bone’s capacity to adapt. When running loads increase too quickly, the tibia experiences repeated bending stress. If recovery isn’t adequate, this leads to:

    • Bone stress reaction

    • Irritation of the periosteum (bone lining)

    • Localised pain along the medial tibia

    If ignored, MTSS can progress to a tibial stress fracture, which requires significantly longer time away from running.

    That’s why early management matters.

    Why Do Shin Splints Develop?

    A large systematic review by Winkelmann et al. (2016) identified over 100 potential risk factors for MTSS, with several consistently seen in clinical practice.

    Key Risk Factors Supported by Research

    1. Training Load Errors
    Rapid increases in running volume, intensity, or frequency are one of the strongest contributors.
    (Winters et al., 2013; Nielsen et al., 2012)

    2. Higher Body Mass Index (BMI)
    Greater body mass increases tibial loading forces.

    3. Biomechanical Factors

    • Increased navicular drop (foot pronation)

    • Greater plantarflexion range

    • Hip muscle weakness and poor pelvic control

    4. Previous History of MTSS
    Recurrence risk is higher without proper rehabilitation.

    Importantly flat feet alone are rarely the sole cause.

    What we often see clinically is this chain reaction:

    Poor hip control → knee collapses inward → foot over-pronates → increased traction stress on medial tibia.

    The foot is often the victim, not the culprit.

    Why Rest Alone Isn’t Enough

    Yes — rest reduces pain. But rest does not improve:

    • Load tolerance

    • Running capacity

    • Strength deficits

    • Movement control

    This explains why shin splints are common in recreational runners but less frequent in well-structured training programs. Higher-level athletes typically follow progressive loading plans that allow bone and tendon adaptation.

    Research consistently supports graded loading and strengthening as key components of recovery (Moen et al., 2012).

    .

    How to Manage Shin Splints (Early Stage Tips)

    If your symptoms are mild to moderate, here are evidence-informed starting points:

    1️⃣ Relative Rest (Not Complete Rest)

    Reduce running volume by 30–50%.
    Avoid sharp increases in load.
    Swap some runs for cycling or swimming temporarily.

    2️⃣ Strengthen the “Shock Absorbers”

    Focus on:

    • Calf strength (bent and straight knee)

    • Tibialis posterior strengthening

    • Glute medius and hip control exercises

    • Single-leg stability work

    Improving hip strength can reduce tibial loading by improving force control through the limb.

    3️⃣ Manage Running Workload

    Follow the “10% rule” cautiously.
    Allow recovery days between harder sessions.
    Avoid sudden terrain changes (e.g., grass → concrete).

    4️⃣ Consider Footwear

    Ensure shoes are not worn out (>600–800km).
    Orthotics may help some individuals — but only after assessment.

    When Should You See a Physio?

    Seek professional assessment if:

    • Pain persists longer than 2–3 weeks

    • Pain becomes sharp and localised

    • Hopping on one leg is painful

    • Symptoms worsen despite reducing load

    Early intervention reduces the risk of progression to stress fracture.

    How Praxis Approaches Shin Splints

    At Praxis, we don’t treat “shin splints.”
    We treat your specific loading problem.

    Your plan may include:

    ✔ Comprehensive running and strength assessment
    ✔ Individualised load management plan
    ✔ Targeted strength and control program
    ✔ Manual therapy where appropriate
    ✔ Gradual return-to-run progression
    ✔ Prevention strategy for long-term performance

    Because no two runners load the same way, and no two recovery plans should be identical.

    If you’re dealing with shin splints, or want to prevent them from coming back, our team can help.

    Book an in-depth running and lower limb assessment today.

    📍 Clinics in Teneriffe, Buranda & Carseldine
    📞 (07) 3102 3337
    💻 Book online

    💪 Trusted by athletes. Backed by evidence. Here for everyone.

    The Praxis Team.

    PREVENT | PREPARE | PERFORM

    References

    • Winkelmann ZK et al. (2016). Risk factors for medial tibial stress syndrome in active individuals. Journal of Athletic Training, 51(12), 1049–1052.

    • Winters M et al. (2013). Medial tibial stress syndrome: a critical review. Sports Medicine, 43(12), 1315–1333.

    • Moen MH et al. (2012). Treatment of medial tibial stress syndrome: a systematic review. Sports Medicine, 42(11), 965–981.

    • Nielsen RO et al. (2012). Training errors and running-related injuries. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy, 7(1), 58–75.

     

    Images:

    The above images are owned by the “Trainer Academy (https://traineracademy.org/) ” and used in this article with thanks.

    References:

    1. Hopper D, Deacon S, Das S, et al. Dynamic soft tissue mobilization increases hamstring flexibility in healthy male subjects. Br J Sports Med. 2004;39:594–598
    2. Weerapong, P., Hume, P.A. & Kolt, G.S. The mechanisms of massage and effects on performance, muscle recovery and injury prevention. Sports Med 2005; 35: 235
    3. Morelli M, Seaborne DE, Sullivan SJ. Changes in h-reflex amplitude during massage of triceps surae in healthy subjects.J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1990;12(2):55-9.
    4. Arroyo-Morales M1, Fernández-Lao C, Ariza-García A, Toro-Velasco C, Winters M, Díaz-Rodríguez L, Cantarero-Villanueva I, Huijbregts P, Fernández-De-las-Peñas C. Psychophysiological effects of preperformance massage before isokinetic exercise. J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Feb;25(2):481-8.

    https://www.massagemyotherapy.com.au/Home

    Fact or Fiction – Strength Training

    Fact or Fiction – Strength Training

    I’ve been doing my exercises for two weeks religiously and I’m no stronger! This will never work!

    ANSWER: Fiction

    How long does it take to have strength gains? The answer is actually in two parts. Increasing muscle size (hypertrophy) takes a minimum of 6 weeks, and repetitive exposures to fatiguing loads. BUT, neural adaptations can occur over the first 1-2 weeks.

    What the heck is neural adaptations? Imaging you have a small car battery trying to start a truck. It will struggle to do a good job again and again and fade easily. Now try using 10 of those same smaller batteries, which makes the engine start easier. A similar type of thing happens with our nervous system as we train. We become much more efficient with our neural firing to the muscle.

    As you can see in the picture below, you have a long way to go in your strengthening after those first two weeks. That is often why we often need to see beyond when the pain goes away as we know that there is so much more work to be done!

    If you have been troubled by niggles and pains, don’t hesitate to contact us to ensure we can help you prevent prepare perform! Book online or call us on (07) 3102 3337.

    #factorfictionfriday #praxisphysio #physioeducation #knowledgeiskey

    Sale, D. G. (1988). Neural adaptation to resistance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 20(5 Suppl), S135-145. doi:10.1249/00005768-198810001-00009

    Pilates: Mat vs Reformer Pilates (Part 2 of 3)

    Pilates: Mat vs Reformer Pilates (Part 2 of 3)

    In part one, we unearthed that pilates has a role to play in reducing the severity of chronic lower back pain. In part two, we tackle a common question from our patients and delve further into the research to see if there is a difference between mat and reformer pilates.

    SUMMARY:

    • A reformer is a large piece of pilates equipment that utilises a spring mechanism to apply load in various positions and degrees of loading from gravity.
    • Both forms of exercise are better than the ‘wait and see’ or pharmacological approach with respect to chronic lower back pain
    • The use of reformers may provide a larger stimuli to the sensory system which facilitates proper performance due to better stabilisation
    • Pilates promotes the restoration of the function of muscles involved in lumbopelvic stabilisation, that is, transversus abdominis, multifidus, diaphragm and pelvic floor muscles (the “core”)
    • Reformer pilates provides more options for strengthening, ideal for those recovering from injury, pregnancy or surgery

     

    As a general rule, the aim of pilates is to restore or sustain the motor control of the lumbar spine and proper body posture. Joseph Pilates (the founder of pilates) believed beginning exercise in the horizontal plane was important to relieve the stress and strain on the joints, and to align the body before adding additional gravitational forces while standing, sitting or kneeling.

    Both mat and reformer are popular types of pilates which both focus on strengthening. Mat pilates, as its names suggests is a floor based method that tends to use bodyweight as the chief form of resistance.

    Reformer, is the most popular equipment of Pilates. The design of Reformer utilises a spring mechanism that the person works to control while moving in various planes (Bulguroglu et al 2017). Reformer pilates allows more exercises compared to a mat and it provides the option of performing exercises numerous body positions – from your back, side, stomach and being seated — and also on your feet or knees.

    COMPARE THE PAIR

    Not a great deal of research has been conducted on differentiating the two forms of pilates. What studies do exist tend poorly define what equipment was used or whether individual tailoring of the sessions occurred.

    Luz et al compared the effectiveness of Pilates mat and equipment-based Pilates exercises (with the use of Reformer) in a group of 86 individuals with chronic lower back pain. The 6-week routine included individual, 1-hour sessions performed twice a week and supervised by a Pilates-experienced physical therapist. The outcome measures were: pain intensity, disability, global perceived effect, patient’s specific disability and fear of movement, known as kinesiophobia (Luz et al 2014). The assessment was recorded after 6-week intervention and 6 months. A significant difference was noted in both groups after a 6-week programme in all of the areas evaluated. After 6 months however, a significant difference was found in disability, specific disability and kinesiophobia in favour of equipment-based Pilates exercises (Luz et al 2014; Eilks et al 2019).

     

    In the study by Cruz-Diaz et al, the influence of Pilates mat exercises and equipment-based Pilates exercises (with reformer) on pain, disability, kinesiophobia and activation of transversus abdominis (expressed as a change in muscle thickness and assessed by real-time ultrasound examination) was assessed. The trial involved 98 patients with chronic lower back pan (CLBP) allocated to three groups: Pilates mat exercises, Pilates apparatus or the control group. The programme was conducted in groups of four participants during 12 weeks with 50 min sessions (twice a week). The evaluation was carried out during intervention (6 weeks after baseline) and after 12 weeks. As with Luz et al, significant improvement were shown in both groups for all outcome measures after 6 and 12 weeks. However, in the comparison between groups, the superiority of equipment-based Pilates was noted (Cruz-Diaz et al 2017).In both studies, it was suggested that the finding may be an effect of the use of apparatus in exercises that provides larger stimuli to the sensory system, resulting in larger feedback, which facilitates proper performance due to better stabilisation (Eilks et al 2019). According to da Luz et al, this result may also be caused by a placebo effect inherent for the application of equipment. As noted earlier however, reformer pilates offers a larger scope of exercises to draw upon for those who are limited by pain, weakness or fear of movement.So there you have it. What little research there is suggests that any pilates is good for your rehabilitation or as a part of your ongoing strength program. However, it appears that reformer pilates is more effective, and allows a greater degree of variability of training.For more about what makes Praxis Pilates special, check out our website here.Join us for part 3 next week where we look at what the research suggests regarding the frequency of pilates. Is more actually better?Till next time – Praxis what you preachPrevent. Prepare. Perform

    References:

    1. Eliks, M., Zgorzalewicz-Stachowiak, M., & Zeńczak-Praga, K. (2019). Application of Pilates-based exercises in the treatment of chronic non-specific low back pain: state of the art. Postgraduate medical journal, 95(1119), 41-45.
    2. da Luz Jr, M. A., Costa, L. O. P., Fuhro, F. F., Manzoni, A. C. T., Oliveira, N. T. B., & Cabral, C. M. N. (2014). Effectiveness of mat Pilates or equipment-based Pilates exercises in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Physical therapy, 94(5), 623-631.
    3. Bulguroglu, I., Guclu-Gunduz, A., Yazici, G., Ozkul, C., Irkec, C., Nazliel, B., & Batur-Caglayan, H. Z. (2017). The effects of Mat Pilates and Reformer Pilates in patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A randomized controlled study. NeuroRehabilitation, 41(2), 413-422.
    4. Cruz-Díaz, D., Bergamin, M., Gobbo, S., Martínez-Amat, A., & Hita-Contreras, F. (2017). Comparative effects of 12 weeks of equipment based and mat Pilates in patients with Chronic Low Back Pain on pain, function and transversus abdominis activation. A randomized controlled trial. Complementary therapies in medicine, 33, 72-77.
    Pilates: Reforming our back pain rehabilitation (Part 1 of 3)

    Pilates: Reforming our back pain rehabilitation (Part 1 of 3)

    With our 30 day pilates challenge starting today, we thought we would take a look at why we love pilates so much for our patients, and what some of the benefits are. Part 1 looks at how pilates affect those with chronic lower back pain. Part 2 looks at the difference between mat and reformer pilates and part 3 looks at how often is required to see the benefit of pilates.

    SUMMARY:

    • Back pain is extremely common, multifactorial, and often reoccurs
    • Strengthening interventions appear better for long term suffers of lower back pain
    • Pilates has been shown to improve muscular strength and endurance of key pelvic and postural musculature associated with lower back pain
    • Specifically, pilates promotes the restoration of the function of muscles involved in lumbopelvic stabilisation, that is, transversus abdominis, multifidus, diaphragm and pelvic floor muscles
    • As little as 2 sessions per week for 6 weeks has been shown to see improvements in pain and function for those with longstanding lower back pain, even after stopping pilates

    Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is one of the commonest musculoskeletal problems in modern society (Anderson 1999) and is a highly prevalent in both the sporting and general public. CLBP is experienced by 70%–80% of adults at some time in their lives (Crombez et al 1999) and as such, the costs associated with LBP and related disability are enormous, causing a major economic burden for patients, governments and health insurance companies (Dagenais 2008).

    Lower back pain has been one of the most extensively studied musculoskeletal conditions as a result of the prevalence and debilitation nature. Its management comprises a range of different intervention strategies including surgery, drug therapy and non-medical intervention like rehabilitation (Paolucci et al 2018). Within Physiotherapy, exercise therapy is probably the most commonly used intervention for the treatment of patients with chronic non-specific LBP due to its plausible biological rationale and low cost.

    Whilst general conditioning programs to train strength and endurance of the spine musculature have been shown to reduce pain intensity and disability (Rainville et al 2004), the popularity of pilates (both mat and reformer) has helped provide an accessible and supervised form of therapeutic exercise.

    EVIDENCE FOR PILATES

    The Pilates method, using functional exercises aims to improve muscular strength and endurance. Specifically, the pilates method have promotes the restoration of the function of muscles involved in lumbopelvic stabilisation, that is, transversus abdominis, multifidus, diaphragm and pelvic floor muscles. Using the principles of progressive overload, your body adapts to the incremental loading week after week and consequently results important postural control improvement. In 2009, Curnow and colleagues showed that the Pilates method improves load transfer through the pelvis, something that intuitively helps those with CLBP.

    However, a systematic review (Patti et al 2015) reported evidence that Pilates method-based exercises are more effective than no treatment or minimal physical exercise interventions in the management of chronic nonspecific LBP. Further, they pointed out that the effects of the Pilates method are only proven for patients with chronic nonspecific LBP in the short term.

    A recent study by Natour and colleagues (2015) showed that the group of participants that were practicing Pilates method resulted statistically better compared with the a non exercising group who only used inflammatory medication. Those who were in the pilates group used less pain medication at 45, 90 (conclusion of the Pilates method), and 180 days, 90 days after the conclusion of the exercise program.

    In conclusion, Pilates as an exercise choice is more effective than minimal physical exercise or drug based interventions in reducing pain and disability in the short-term period. There is agreement that exercise “helps” in the treatment of chronic pain, but it is still not clear exactly which factors or particular kind of exercises may be responsible of such improvements (Natour et al 2015; Patti et al 2015). Praxis Physiotherapy has always been a strong proponent of movement and loading early in rehabilitation (more on this in later blogs!).

    In the next instalment, we discuss the difference between mat and reformer pilates and perhaps find some more answers regarding which exercise regime reigns supreme!

    Check out all our other reformer pilates services on our website

    Until next time,

    Prevent. Prepare. Perform.

    References:

    1. Andersson GB. Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain. Lancet. 1999;354(91789178):581–585.
    2. Crombez G, Vlaeyen JW, Heuts PH, Lysens R, Crombez G. Pain-related fear is more disabling than pain itself: evidence on the role of pain-related fear in chronic back pain disability. Pain. 1999;80(1-2):329–339.
    3. Dagenais DC, Caro J, Haldeman S. A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally. The Spine Journal 2008;8(1):8‐20.
    4. Paolucci, T., Attanasi, C., Cecchini, W., Marazzi, A., Capobianco, S. V., & Santilli, V. (2019). Chronic low back pain and postural rehabilitation exercise: a literature review. Journal of pain research, 12, 95.
    5. Rainville J, Hartigan C, Martinez E, Limke J, Jouve C, Finno M. Exercise as a treatment for chronic low back pain. Spine J. 2004;4:106-115
    6. Patti, A., Bianco, A., Paoli, A., Messina, G., Montalto, M. A., Bellafiore, M., … & Palma, A. (2015). Effects of Pilates exercise programs in people with chronic low back pain: a systematic review. Medicine, 94(4).
    7. Curnow, D., Cobbin, D., Wyndham, J., & Choy, S. B. (2009). Altered motor control, posture and the Pilates method of exercise prescription. Journal of bodywork and movement therapies, 13(1), 104-111.
    8. Natour, J., Cazotti, L. D. A., Ribeiro, L. H., Baptista, A. S., & Jones, A. (2015). Pilates improves pain, function and quality of life in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Clinical rehabilitation, 29(1), 59-68.
    Pilates Launch Day! Northside Clinic

    Pilates Launch Day! Northside Clinic

    OPENING DAY || Exciting times at Praxis! We are stoked to be launching our reformer pilates classes @clubcoops on Saturday March 17. We have FREE 30min classes starting at 8am with Emma and Tara! Opening day specials available! Email admin@praxisphysio.com.au or call (07) 3102 3337 or chat to the Club Coops front desk to secure your FREE class today! www.praxisphysio.com.au